DBRS Assigns Provisional Ratings to Bumper 6 (NL) Finance B.V.

DBRS Ratings Limited (DBRS) has today assigned provisional ratings of AAA (sf) to the Class A Notes and AA (high) (sf) to the Class B Notes to be issued by Bumper 6 (NL) Finance B.V. (“Bumper 6”). The receivables to be securitised a pool consisting of lease receivables and residual value cash flows extended to corporate, governmental and SME customers and granted by LeasePlan Nederland N.V. (‘LPNL’) in the Netherlands. The portfolio will be serviced by LPNL.

The ratings are based upon review by DBRS of the following analytical considerations:

• Transaction capital structure, and form and sufficiency of available credit enhancement.
• Relevant credit enhancement in the form of subordination and a subordinated loan. Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support the DBRS projected expected cumulative net loss assumption under various stress scenarios at a AAA (sf) standard for the Class A Notes and at a AA (high) (sf) Class B Notes to be issued by Bumper 6.
• The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow assumptions and repay investors according to the terms in which they have invested.
• The transaction parties' capabilities with respect to originations, underwriting, servicing, and financial strength.
• The credit quality of the collateral and ability of the Servicer to perform collection activities on the collateral.
• The legal structure and presence of legal opinions addressing the assignment of the assets to the issuer and the consistency with the DBRS Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.

The above mentioned ratings are provisional. Ratings will be finalised upon receipt of execution version of the governing Transaction documents. To the extent that the documents and information provided to DBRS as of this date differ from the executed version of the governing transaction documents, DBRS may assign different final ratings to the Notes or may avoid assigning final ratings to the Notes altogether.

Notes:
All figures are in EUR unless otherwise noted.

The principal methodology applicable is the Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.

Other methodologies and criteria referenced in this transaction are listed at the end of this press release.

This can be found on www.dbrs.com at:
http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies

For a more detailed discussion of sovereign risk impact on Structured Finance ratings, please refer to DBRS commentary “The Effect of Sovereign Risk on Securitisations in the Euro Area” on: http://www.dbrs.com/industries/bucket/id/10036/name/commentaries/

The sources of information used for this rating include performance data relating to the receivables provided by LPNL DBRS received cumulative monthly vintage historical performance data on gross defaults and recoveries going back to July 2009 relating to LPNL originations. Data was also provided relating to average gross monthly vehicle disposal results from July 2009 to June 2014, delinquencies, and loan level data as well as provisional portfolio stratification tables that allowed DBRS to further assess the portfolio. DBRS considers the information available to it for the purposes of providing this rating was of satisfactory quality.

DBRS does not audit the information it receives in connection with the rating process, and it does not and cannot independently verify that information in every instance.

This rating concerns a newly issued financial instrument. This is the first DBRS rating on this financial instrument.

The full report providing additional analytical detail is available by clicking on the link or by contacting us at info@dbrs.com.

Information regarding DBRS ratings, including definitions, policies and methodologies are available on www.dbrs.com.

To assess the impact of the changing the transaction parameters on the rating, DBRS considered the following stress scenarios, as compared to the parameters used to determine the rating (the “Base Case”):

• Probability of Default Rate Used: Base Case PD of 1.58%, a 25% and 50% increase on the base case PD.
• Recovery Rate Used: Base case Recovery Rate of 54.57%.
• Residual Value Loss: Base Case ‘AAA (sf)’ of 45%, Base Case ‘AA (high) (sf)’ of 43% and a 25% and 50% increase in Residual Value Loss.

DBRS concludes that for the Class A Notes:

• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to maintain the rating of the Class A Notes to an ‘AAA’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to downgrade the rating of the Class A Notes to an ‘AA (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘AA (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘A (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘AA’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘AA (low)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘A (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class A Notes to an ‘A’ (sf) rating.

DBRS concludes that for the Class B Notes:

• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘AA’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘AA(low)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘A (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘BBB (high) ‘(sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘A (high)’ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 25%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘A‘(sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 25% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘BBB‘ (sf) rating.
• A hypothetical increase of the base case PD and LGD by 50% and a hypothetical increase of the Residual Value Loss by 50%, ceteris paribus, would lead to a downgrade of the Class B Notes to an ‘BBB (low) ‘(sf) rating.

For further information on DBRS historic default rates published by the European Securities and Markets Administration (“ESMA”) in a central repository, see:
http://cerep.esma.europa.eu/cerep-web/statistics/defaults.xhtml.

Ratings assigned by DBRS Ratings Limited are subject to EU regulations only.

Initial Lead Analyst: David Sanchez
Initial Rating Date: October 28, 2014
Initial Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

Last Rating Date: Not applicable; no last rating date.

Lead Surveillance Analyst: Vito Natale
Rating Committee Chair: Chuck Weilamann

DBRS Ratings Limited
1 Minster Court, 10th Floor
Mincing Lane
London
EC3R 7AA
United Kingdom

Registered in England and Wales: No. 7139960

The rating methodologies and criteria used in the analysis of this transaction can be found at: http://www.dbrs.com/about/methodologies.

• Rating European Consumer and Commercial Asset-Backed Securitisations.
• Legal Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.
• Derivative Criteria for European Structured Finance Transactions.
• Operational Risk Assessment for European Structured Finance Servicers.
• Unified Interest Rate Model Methodology for European Securitisations.